Here is some additional information on our newest bishop - David Rice. As you may recall, while Bishop David Rice is clearly a well qualified candidate there were some process issues I had some difficulty. The Standing Committee did not create, with the various parishes in the diocese, a profile of the needs of the diocese, as should be the case. The Standing Committee took only one recommendation from the Presiding Bishop. Under normal circumstances Several clergy would apply for the position and the Standing Committee would act as the search committee and review and process the candidates. As a bonus, for both Bishop Talton and Bishop Lamb, each toured the diocese and visited with most , if not all, parishes before the election process took place. Bishop David was brought into the diocese as an Assisting Bishop even though he had not taken the vows of an Episcopal Bishop, and before a vote had been taken for Bishop Rice to assume the position of Bishop of the diocese of San Joaquin. And the appearance of even one Anglican (because he had not taken the vows ascribed to a Bishop in the Episcopal diocese creates interesting grist for the Stand Firm crowd's mill.
This type of process looks very much like the process for clergy in the San Joaquin Diocese when John David Schofield. No transparency, no openness, no easy going anything. Gives the impression that new names, same game.
Here is the link to a newspaper article as the Bishop was in transition.
here is the link to Bishop David Rice.
In reinforcing one point I do not know Bishop David Rice and his resume is indeed impressive and with lay persons who have talked with him he is friendly, outgoing, and very spiritual.
What is not the case is one of process. Process is currently in vogue since JDS stacked the proverbial deck with his "yes men". We asked for transparency, open dialogue, and to see the checks and balances work for the diocese.